3. Assessment of policies to address skill shortages and improve matching
3.4. Building labour market resilience: anticipating and matching skills policies
Skills intelligence meaningfully blends quantitative and qualitative information on labour market needs and skills, allowing skills anticipation. Several tools and methods (353) are already in place across the Member States (354) that allow for methodologically accurate and relevant skills anticipation outputs (Table 3.5).
The main approaches use skills assessments/surveys and labour market indicators to map the current state of skills demand and supply. Skills forecasts typically apply an economic model where skills are proxied by occupations and/or qualifications. These provide expected developments of future skills demand and supply, based on assumptions informed by past trajectories. Technological and skills foresight activities are used to gain a better understanding of the possible futures that may lie ahead for societies, economies and labour markets. Including more qualitative methodologies allows for exploration of the steps needed to move towards the desired future. Less traditional methods are then necessary to deepen understandings of the implications of technological change and emerging skill needs. These include explorations of automated skills intelligence methods that use Big Data and AI-driven analyses (e.g. those building on online job advertisements), as well as patent data, scientific databases, and online course websites. (355)
A growing number of Member States apply skills anticipation methods in their policy-making cycles (Table 3.5). (356) At least one skills anticipation method is used in each Member State, with some also implementing complementary methods. Skills forecasts remain the backbone of skills intelligence generation in most countries, run at national, regional, or even sectoral level, either regularly or periodically. 2019’s Skills Forecast continues to serve skills intelligence needs in Member States without their own regular forecasts, as well as complementing national sources by allowing harmonised comparison of information across Member States.
Table 3.5
Tools for carrying out skills assessment and anticipation
Type of activity |
Data collected |
---|---|
Descriptive statistics/stock-taking |
Estimates of overall demand and supply of skills and technology use, often based on collating data from various sources (e.g. sector skill studies) |
Quantitative forecasting |
Forecasting or projecting future demand for skills, typically using econometric modelling |
Skills and jobs surveys (questionnaire surveys) |
Assessments of demand/supply of skills and technology use, usually with an assessment of the extent to which demand and supply are in balance |
Graduate tracer studies |
Using matched administrative datasets or surveys to track people through education and the labour market to see how the former influence the latter |
Qualitative research |
Use of non-quantitative techniques to gather in-depth information about current and future skill demand/supply and technology trends (e.g. via company case studies, use of focus groups) |
Foresight |
Critical thinking about the future of skills supply/demand and technology trends, using participatory methodologies |
Big Data |
Use of web sourcing, combined with text mining and machine learning approaches, to collect and classify data about skills, vacancies, technologies, etc. |
Source: (Cedefop, 2021)
The global market is increasingly volatile and vulnerable to a wide range of factors and shocks, which may have prompted the recent uptake of foresight methods. Several Member States have expanded their foresight capacity to support their understanding of emerging skills needs in different scenarios/futures. As part of the shift towards more sophisticated approaches, Big Data-powered skills intelligence is rapidly expanding and is now broadly applied by PES. Some Member States resort to employer surveys to map sectoral trends, while graduate tracking or tracing surveys are a growth area to enable the understanding of skills supply and education-to-work transitions.
There is room for innovation and better addressing of local needs. This is true both of countries with skills intelligence systems in development and also those at a more mature stage. Next-generation skills intelligence needs to be more user-centred, focus on transitions (green, digital, others), and provide better insight into the links between all forms of learning and skills.
Notes
- 353. Cedefop, in collaboration with the ILO and the European Training Foundation (ETF), published a series of methodological guides to anticipating and matching skills and jobs, targeting EU policy makers and decision makers (Cedefop, 2021c), (Cedefop, 2021b), (Cedefop, 2021d).
- 354. Cedefop’s online skills-matching tool offers a collection of policy instruments from Member States that use information on labour market trends and anticipated skills needs to inform and shape upskilling or other skills-matching policies for the current and future world of work.
- 355. (Cedefop, 2021b).
- 356. See Cedefop’s matching skills database here for an overview of Member States’ policy instruments.