europa.eu REFIT Scoreboard
← Internal market, industry, entrepreneurship, SMEs and statistics

Remedies Directive (Public Procurement)

Overall State of Play:

Evaluation finalised; COM(2017)28 and SWD(2017)13, 24 January 2017

Scope

Evaluation of Directive 2007/66/EC amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC with regard to improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of public contracts (the Remedies Directives)

State of play, main conclusions, outlook

Based on the evaluation, the Commission concluded that the Remedies Directives, in particular the amendments introduced by Directive 2007/66/EC, largely meet their objectives in an effective and efficient way although it has not been possible to quantify the concrete extent of their cost/benefits. Even if specific concerns are reported in some Member States, they usually stem from national measures and not from the Remedies Directives themselves. In general qualitative terms, the benefits of the Remedies Directives outweigh their costs. They remain relevant and continue to bring EU added value. However, certain shortcomings were identified which relate to: the lack of clarity of certain provisions, and the fact information on national remedies systems has not been collected in a structured manner and has been rarely used for policy making purposes. Generally, first instance administrative review bodies are more effective than first instance judicial instances in terms of the duration of procedures and standards of review.

The Commission takes the following measures to tackle these issues:

(a) Guidance on some outstanding aspects of the Remedies Directives;

(b) Promotion of transparency: together with Member States the Commission developed a limited number of objective, measurable and relevant indicators on the functioning of remedies systems in Member States (e.g. number of complaints, costs, length of procedures) under the Single Market Scoreboard, and which allow to compare the efficiency of remedies systems in Member States;

(c) Promotion of cooperation between first instance review bodies.

(d) Consistent enforcement activities and monitoring: in cases where the most significant and systemic breaches of the Remedies Directives are identified, the Commission takes appropriate measures to bring the relevant national practices into line with EU rules.

Estimated savings and benefits

The Remedies Directives provided overall benefits in line with the intended impacts, both direct and indirect. There are clear indications that the benefits achieved through the Remedies Directives outweigh their costs.

The costs to contracting authorities and suppliers for bringing forward or defending a review case (including direct and indirect costs) vary widely across the EU, typically accounting for 0.4%-0.6% of the contract value. If the Remedies Directives were repealed, they could be even higher because of national differences in the review and remedies rules and a lack of harmonisation at the level leading to a more cumbersome context for tenderers and others.

The benefits are important in terms of sound financial management, the best price/quality ratio and deterrence, especially when considering the value of invitations to tender published on Tenders Electronic Daily. The 2011 evaluation of EU public procurement legislation in general estimated that savings of 5% realised for c.a. EUR 420 billion of public contracts that were published at EU level would translate into savings or higher public investment of over EUR 20 billion a year. The effective implementation of the Remedies Directives can therefore make such estimated savings from the procurement directives more likely to happen. Finally, the evaluation did not identify any administrative burden considered to be unnecessary for the operation of the Remedies Directives.