europa.eu REFIT Scoreboard
← Justice, consumers and gender equality

Consumer Protection Cooperation

Overall state of play:

Evaluation: Finalised 25.05.2016; COM (2016) 284
Commission Proposal: Adopted, 25.05.2016; COM (2016) 283
Legal Act: Adopted, Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 published in OJ L 345 of 27.12. 2017, p. 1

State of play, main conclusions, outlook

The Commission evaluated Regulation (EC) N° 2006/2004 on the cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws. The results of the evaluation were published in May 2016.

The evaluation showed that the Consumer Protection Cooperation Regulation (CPC) had been beneficial for the competent authorities, consumers and traders and confirmed the appropriateness and relevance of its objectives. It also pointed out that these objectives had not been fully achieved and that the Regulation had not been exploited to its full potential.

In follow-up to the findings of the evaluation, the Commission adopted a proposal for a review of Regulation (EC) 2006/2004.

The proposal aimed at improving the effectiveness of public enforcement of EU consumer law and the governance of EU retail cross-border markets. Costs for public enforcement actions and transaction costs for economic actors were expected to decrease.

In December 2021, the Commission launched a study which helps the Commission to fulfil its legal obligation to report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the CPC Regulation by 17 January 2023.

Estimated savings and benefits

The following benefits and savings were calculated in respect to the Commission proposal to review the Regulation:

- Consumers would benefit from better and safer market conditions when purchasing cross-border. It was estimated for the subset of five online markets that a decrease of 10 points in the non-compliance rate of 37% could reduce consumer detriment from an estimated EUR 770 million per year to about EUR 539 million, i.e. by 30%.

- Any new single CPC action against a widespread practice could also reduce consumer's detriment across the EU (e.g. by an estimated EUR 68 million in the case of the coordinated action against the misleading marketing of in-app offers in online games).

- Savings for authorities could be achieved through the possibility to reuse evidence, avoid duplication and ensure maximum consistency of enforcement actions. Pooling of resources to address widespread infringements would save resources as one coordinated action would replace 28 national actions, resulting in net savings varying from around EUR 180 000 (in case of successful coordinated action) to around EUR815 000 (in case of failed action).