Framework
What is the European Commission?
The European Commission is the executive arm of the European Union. Alongside the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, it is one of three main institutions that govern the Union, and by far the largest. The Commission’s activities are steered by 27 Commissioners, assisted by over 30 000 civil servants and other staff working in 34 Directorates-General (DGs), 16 services/offices and departments all over the world. Each Commissioner takes responsibility for a particular area of policy and heads one or more entities that are generally known as DGs.
The Commission’s primary role is to propose and enact legislation, and to act as ‘Guardian of the Treaties’, which involves responsibility for initiating infringement proceedings at the European Court of Justice against Member States and others whom it considers to be in breach of the EU Treaties and other Community law. The Commission also negotiates international agreements on behalf of the EU in close cooperation with the Council of the European Union.
The Commission’s headquarters are in Brussels (Belgium), but it also has offices in Luxembourg, Grange (Ireland), Geel (Belgium), Ispra (Italy), Karlsruhe (Germany), Petten (The Netherlands), Seville (Spain) and many other places, agencies in several Member States and representations in all EU countries (http://ec.europa.eu/about/ds_en.htm). On 1st December 2009, the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force giving the Commission the institutional tools needed for the various enlargements and for meeting the challenges of an EU of 27 Member States.
Activities at the EMAS sites
The Commission's main sites are registered under its Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS).
Is the main site, the Commission's administrative centre, with a range of buildings dominated by offices but including conference centres, catering facilities, storage depots, print shops, childcare, medical and sports facilities.
The Luxembourg site is of a similar nature, though smaller but also hosts the main data centres of the Commission and a small radiation protection laboratory operated by the DG for Energy.
The five Joint Research Centre (JRC) sites outside Brussels are all incorporated under EMAS. In contrast to Brussels and Luxembourg, these scientific sites mainly comprise unique research and technical infrastructures. More details on the different JRC sites can be found here and a summary is presented as follows.
- JRC Geel (Belgium) is recognised worldwide, both for being a major certified reference material (CRM) producer as well as for its nuclear activities with its two nuclear accelerators Gelina and Monnet. The site is also known for its expertise in metrology and standardisation in several fields (nuclear, health and food, transport and border security).
- JRC Ispra (Italy) is considered one of
Europe's leading research campuses with many laboratories and research infrastructures, including a
power plant, a fire station and a water treatment facility as well as over 100 heated buildings. There
are also several nuclear installations on the site as described below.
- Nuclear activities in long term shutdown, i.e. interrupted and included in the decommissioning programme (ESSOR – ESSais ORgel , Cyclotron, LCSR - Laboratorio Caldo Studi e Ricerche, STRR - Stazione Trattamento Rifiuti Radioattivi Liquidi). The ECO-FARO Esperienza Critica ORGEL Fuel Assemblies melting Oven installation was dismantled in 2014.
- Installations where activities functional to the decommissioning programme are performed, e.g. radioactive waste management (Stazione Gestione Rifiuti Radioattivi, Stazione Trattamento Effluenti Liquidi, Tank farm, Intermim Storage Facility, Dry Wells) and nuclear fuel dismantling (Atelier Démantèlement Eléments Combustible).
- Laboratories where research activities connected to nuclear safety and safeguards are performed (PERLA: PERformance LAboratory, PUNITA: PUlsed Neutron Interrogation Test Assembly).
- JRC Karlsruhe (Germany) is a self-contained site located in a research campus (KIT Campus Nord) on the outskirts of Karlsruhe, and the core of the JRC research for Nuclear Safety and Security. Research activities are conducted only in the nuclear field within the framework of the EURATOM treaty. They cover the following: fundamental properties and applications, safety of nuclear fuels and fuel cycle, nuclear waste management and decommissioning, monitoring of radioactivity in the environment, nuclear safeguards, nuclear non-proliferation and security (including trainings e.g. EUSECTRA).
- JRC Petten (The Netherlands) executes and manages institutional and competitive research activities to support European policy-making for energy, mobility and climate. In particular, for energy - ensuring sustainable, safe, secure and efficient energy production, distribution and use); for mobility - fostering sustainable and efficient mobility in Europe; and for climate - providing scientific and technical analysis to support to integrated air quality, climate and related policies.
- JRC Seville (Spain) provides socio-economic and techno-economic support for the conception, development, implementation and monitoring of EU policies. It has advanced computing infrastructure. As an administrative building, it is similar in nature to the EMAS sites of Brussels and Luxembourg, with the added complexity of occupying rented premises.
DG SANTE site at Grange, Ireland is a purpose-built low level wooden clad structure dating from 2002 and set in countryside 45km north west of Dublin. It accommodates Directorate F, Health and Food Audits and Analysis, but was previously known as the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO). Many staff members are inspectors or auditors and travel frequently, and typically up to half may be away from the office at any one time.
The activities of the Houses of Europe are typically administrative, communication and public outreach activities, augmented by additional functions such as conference and meeting organisation, supporting the local activities of European Parliament Members (in the case of EPLOs), and similar. EMAS in 2021 started with the sites of Vienna (Austria) and Valletta (Malta). In 2022 the sites Budapest (Hungary) and Nicosia (Cyprus) were added. In 2023 the sites The Hague (the Netherlands), Copenhagen (Denmark) and Sofia (Bulgaria) were added. These sites are jointly managed with the European Parliament's Liaison Offices in buildings known as the Houses of Europe (HoE), data for the HoE are included in a separate Annex as a standalone document, due to their small size compared to the other sites and to the continuous increase of the number of sites during the years.
HoE environmental statementWhat was new in 2023?
In 2023 the Commission continued to implement the Communication establishing the way towards climate neutrality in 2030.
The main system changes since 2022 related to the calculation of the carbon footprint, specifically:
- introducing greater coherence with the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) protocol which affected the calculation of emissions from fixed assets (except buildings), thereby accounting for the total cradle-to-gate emissions of purchased capital goods in the year of acquisition
- adding new categories in the total carbon emissions calculation such as for furniture and additional foods (e.g. lamb, veal, fruits, vegetables...)
- upgrade, through a new 'in house' dashboard, in reporting emissions from professional travel by staff and experts
- harmonising reporting service contracts between sites, with simplified classification including two new categories
Actions identified as contributing directly to achieving the Greening Communication objective make up a sizable proportion of EMAS actions. Around 300 actions were identified in the 2023 Global Annual Action Plan rising to nearly 400 in 2024.
The scope of the EMAS system continued to expand with the addition of three further Commission Representations in Member State - Den Haag, Copenhagen and Sofia, bringing the total to seven.
While the number of individual sites within the Commission's registration increased to 15, as the total surface area covered by buildings registered in the system remained below the highest levels recorded from 2019 to 2021 (figure Evolution of EMAS registered area (sq. m)). The slight increase in surface area from 2022 to 2023 was due largely to the inclusion of a new major building (L107), also contributing to a rise in staff in the EMAS scope (figure below, Evolution of staff in EMAS registered area). Since the EMAS system reached relative maturity in 2014 when it included the eight major Commission sites, there has been in recent years a reduction in total surface area, despite rising staff numbers indicating progress towards more efficient use of the buildings.
People first – Greening the European Commission



In 2023, the Commission continued implementing actions from the Greening initiative, for example:
- Preparation of the new Guide to Missions
- More than 8000 colleagues (25% office space) in dynamic collaborative space
- 79% corporate car fleet low or zero emissions: target exceeded
- Greening the real estate park: abandoning old buildings with low energy efficiency (sales procedure of 23 buildings ongoing); negotiations started for the occupation of 3 new energy efficient buildings, in addition to L107, L51, SB34 and C-46
- A survey to estimate emissions from teleworking was launched on 27/09/2023
- Brussels biodiversity study/strategy resulted in 2 biodiversity projects at buildings B-28 and ORBAN/L-41
- Development of new green roofs projects in CHAR and ORBAN
- Brussels study for the potential for photovoltaic installation resulted in PV panels in BERL, DAV1, L-15, SB34 (still out of scope) for a total of 1140 MWh/y
- Further optimisation of energy consumption in Commission buildings (e.g. BEST summer; end/beginning of year)
- Climate Fresk (a teamwork card-based game on climate science) Facilitators’ Training Program
Environmental policy
The Commission updated its Environmental policy in 2022 to incorporate the European Green Deal that Commission President Ursula von der Leyen introduced in 2019. Following the Commission's adoption of the Communication on the Greening the Commission in April 2022, it is now working towards its headline objective of achieving climate neutrality in 2030.
Under EMAS individual sites may develop their own environmental policy. The policies, corporate and site level, are displayed at the entrance to all Commission buildings. For instance, JRC Ispra's site policy is displayed at the main entrance and at the entrance of the buildings hosting a considerable number of staff (e.g. the canteen, cafeteria and club house).
Governance structure
Corporate coordination of the EMAS system
A College of Commissioners Decision ensures EMAS implementation at a high level. DG.HR's Director General chairs the EMAS Steering Committee (ESC) which meets twice yearly. It defines environmental policy, adopts the Global Annual Action Plan, sets environmental objectives and monitors progress. In addition, and due to the Commission's decentralised organisation, management and line managers not directly involved in the ESC or without formally defined EMAS roles also participate in the system. The Commission’s Management Board established a working group to encourage closer links particularly between Directorates General (DGs) HR, SG and BUDG. The ESC comprises the following services: BUDG, CLIMA, DIGIT, ENER, ENV, HR, JRC, MOVE, SG, SANTE, MARE, RTD, SCIC, OIB and OIL, COMM and the Executive Agencies.
The EMAS coordination team based in Brussels within HR.D7, the Greening, Safety & Buildings Unit of DG HR, assumes day to day coordination. The EMAS Management Representative is responsible to Management for EMAS implementation and is the contact point for external organisations such as IGBE (Brussels Environment) and other EU Institutions. Five full time staff members work predominantly on system coordination including communication and training and are assisted occasionally by a trainee.
The Commission's size and geographic spread requires the EMAS coordination team to work with a network of over 40 staff across the Commission services whose job descriptions include their EMAS responsibilities. The network includes staff dedicated specifically to EMAS site coordination and to raising staff awareness.
EMAS site coordination
The EMAS site coordination team for Brussels is located in unit RE3 of the Office of Infrastructure for Brussels (OIB), the Office responsible for the facility management and building policy within the European Commission in Brussels. Site coordination is ensured by two full time staff members, who integrate a team of 11 responsible, among other files, for the buildings' energy performance and monitoring, environmental compliance of the EC buildings, inclusion of environmental criteria in tenders, namely concerning building works and prospecting the real estate market.
The EMAS site coordination team for Luxembourg is located in Unit O1 of the Office for Infrastructure for Luxembourg (OIL). The Office ensures that all activities associated with the housing of staff, the management of social welfare infrastructure and the logistics of the Commission in Luxembourg are carried out to the best standards. The site coordination is ensured by two and a half time staff members.
The EMAS Site Coordinators at each of the eight sites are EMAS coordination's team’s main contacts and responsible for implementing EMAS at the site level. They report on performance, contribute to the Environmental Statement and participate in preparing site level objectives and actions. The JRC EMAS Coordination ensures the harmonisation and coherence of the inputs of the five JRC sites, when applicable, as well as the interaction with the corporate coordination.
The EMAS Site coordination for the EC Representations is located in unit D2 of DG COMM, in charge of, inter alia, management of the Representations’ infrastructure. A full-time EMAS site coordinator is supported by a back-up, the project managers responsible for maintenance and works in individual sites and the internal communication team for staff engagement purposes. In the European Parliament, the site coordination for the Liaison Offices is integrated in the EMAS and Sustainability Unit attached to the Secretariat-General, supported by an EMAS representative in the Directorate-General for Infrastructure and Logistics. EMAS Site coordinators for Representations and Liaison Offices (EPLOs) ensure day to day coordination in liaison with EMAS coordinators in the Houses of Europe, composed of representatives of the Representation and EPLO.
Correspondents in the services
EMAS correspondents (Brussels and Luxembourg only) provide a link between their directorate-general/department and HR.D7, particularly for communication; and are nominated by their services. They participate in formal meetings on average three times a year, usually before the start of information campaigns.
Other staff contribute to EMAS, particularly those in facilities management, for example by providing data for reporting on resource consumption or waste generation, or when participating in internal and verification audits. Communication campaigns and training target all staff to improve environmental behaviour, and whose attitudes are gauged every two years by surveys.
EMAS scope - areas and staff numbers
The system developed initially in Brussels with a first registration covering eight buildings in 2005. Additional buildings were added yearly, and other sites joined, with virtually full reporting of the eight main sites established in 2014. The scope of the registration for 2022 relating to the eight main sites is included in Annex Scope by site with individual buildings indicated in Brussels and Luxembourg.
Although the area in which the system is implemented has remained stable, staff numbers continue to grow. The system is now expanding to include EU representations in Member States and starting with Valletta and Vienna in 2021, Budapest and Nicosia in 2022, The Hague, Sofia and Copenhagen in 2023.
Evolution of EMAS registered area (sq. m)
Evolution of staff in EMAS registered area
Number of buildings registered under EMAS
Management testimonies for the sites
Marc BECQUET, Director of Office for Infrastructure, Brussels
The mission of OIB is to ensure a functional, safe and comfortable workplace for Commission staff and to provide good quality support and well-being services, based on a client-oriented approach in an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way. Main achievements of 2022 were the reduction in energy consumption, CO2 emissions, office paper consumption, as well as further improvements in waste sorting. They bear witness of the continuous efforts put forward by the OIB through concrete actions in these areas.
Challenging times require extraordinary measures: through the recently adopted Communication on Greening the Commission, the Institution has set a clear target to reduce its CO2 emissions by 60% compared with 2005 figures and to become climate neutral by 2030. This ambition will require significant efforts and investments to which the EC services and in particular the OIB will strongly contribute, in improving the Commission's environmental performance, this way striving towards a more sustainable European Union.
Marc BECQUET, acting Director for Office of Infrastructure and Logistics, Luxembourg
The mission of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Luxembourg (OIL) is to ensure a safe and functional workplace for the staff and to provide services such as transport, office supplies administration, catering and after-school childminding services.
Since 2020, the focus has been on the action plan on Greening the Commission to reach corporate climate neutrality by 2030. In 2023, OIL main achievements were the move of the Publications Office and DG CNECT into the Mercier-Post building with a DGNB certification, and the implementation of the DCS (dynamic collaborative space) in Luxembourg. Moreover, thanks to the various measures taken, energy consumption has continued its downward trend.
Among other actions, OIL made steps towards circular economy by organizing for the first time the Interinstitutional Repair Café. Different actions in the mobility area were also a success, namely the mobility conference organised by OIL and the Ministry of Mobility and Public Works and Velomai at the CPE with the participation of Franck Schleck.
Finally, OIL continues to supervise the construction of the Commission’s main seat – Jean Monnet 2, which is the Commission’s most ambitious environmental-friendly real estate project in Luxembourg.
- Ispra
-
Rien Stroosnijder, responsible for site management, JRC Ispra
EMAS is the most rigorous environmental management system available in Europe and is regarded as the premium standard for environmental excellence. Since early 2012, we have committed to the EMAS scheme, building on and extending our ISO 14001 certified management system. Our environmental policy aims to make sure that site operate in such a way that all activities, which have an environmental impact, are planned and executed in order to minimise damage to the environment, prevent pollution and improve environmental performance. Its implementation is only possible thanks to competent technical staff and strong engagement of all persons on site.
The EMAS results for the European Commission Ispra site during 2023 went generally beyond the targets originally set, particularly due to the impressive work done to reduce our impact on the environment carried out in recent years. Ispra Site Management continued to promote and apply energy saving measures within a more efficient management approach. During 2023 the site's energy consumption decreased by almost 9% compared to the previous year (-20.4% gas consumption) while the contribution from renewable sources increased by 33% thanks to the increasing in use of “green” grid energy (+22.5%) as well as the increase in the energy produced by the PV plants (+30%). This has led to a decrease in CO2eq emissions from energy consumption of about 20.5%.
All the energy saving measures/activities put in place on the JRC-Ispra site are in line with the Communication on Greening the Commission that aims to achieving carbon neutrality by 2030. This is how the Commission intends to implement the European Green Deal internally and thereby lead by example. Our ambitious targets will be supported by our environmental core indicators, which facilitate multi-annual comparability within and between organisations. In all this, a participatory approach and the engagement of staff are key, as is the exchange of best practices with host country authorities and transparent communication of our performance to them and the general public.
-
-
Geel
-
Ciáran NICHOLL, Director of JRC Geel
When JRC-Geel integrated EMAS in 2011, it vouched its commitment to implement an effective environmental management system, despite the challenges of housing and operating specialised EC laboratory infrastructures. Examples include two high energy consuming nuclear accelerators, a high-tech storage facility for reference materials, nuclear and non-nuclear laboratories with over/under atmospheric pressure requirements, etc.
Each year, JRC-Geel monitors and looks at ways to further improve in reducing its environmental impact and complying with the ever-more stringent legal requirements set by the Flanders Region. Thanks to its BMS (Building Management System), JRC-Geel is able to measure and accurately monitor its EMAS indicators and this allows management to take informed decisions and define improvement actions.
In an ageing site like JRC-Geel, real opportunity for saving energy resides in a refurbishment programme of buildings, including their insulation. To capitalise on this, JRC-Geel has launched an action plan with projects to consecutively renovate its facilities, including the deep refurbishment of one building according to the principles and values of the New European Bauhaus initiative. This action plan also seeks to integrate the present and future requirements of the respective JRC-Geel site’s scientific work programmes, all the way up to up to 2034. A temporary downside when implementing refurbishment, insulation jobs and clean up exercises is an inevitable waste increase which contributes to the carbon footprint balance.
An avenue which still requires attention and improved directionality is travelling, despite the JRC commitment to do so.
Finally, the JRC-Geel site is working to preserve and foster biodiversity by creating “natural habitats for fauna” and striving to map its biodiversity through different Bioblitz projects.
-
- Karlsruhe
-
Ulla ENGELMANN, responsible for site management, JRC Karlsruhe
Among the JRC sites, Karlsruhe is unique, being in its entirety a nuclear research facility where continuous operation of energy-intensive systems is mandatory for ensuring nuclear and radiation safety at all times. Combining the very advanced EMAS goals with the realities of an aging infrastructure is not without challenges and major improvements require substantial investments. Pending the completion of our new state-of-the-art laboratory (Wing M) we have successfully optimised monitoring and operation of our old installations and thereby obtained tangible savings in energy consumption for heating and nuclear ventilation in 2022.
JRC Karlsruhe will continue pursuing further environmental improvements in its own facilities in 2023. More globally, our research contributes to ensuring the safety and security of use of nuclear energy which many EU member states rely on as an established low-carbon technology contributing to climate change mitigation.
-
-
Petten
-
Site management, JRC Petten
On the JRC Petten site, the European Commission conducts scientific research and delivers technical support and administrative activities for partners in relation to energy, mobility and climate policies. Increasingly research is based on modelling studies, which generates a more administrative workload.
The research is based on the results of laboratory work in facilities for hydrogen fuel cell testing, hydrogen storage tank testing and optimisation, battery testing and at several locations advanced material testing for nuclear and other high tech industries.
-
-
Seville
-
Mikel Landabaso, Director Fair and Sustainable Economy, JRC Seville
In a world that urgently needs to accelerate efforts to achieve the green transition, it is essential for the European Commission to lead by example in managing and enhancing its own environmental performance. The JRC Seville site is fully dedicated to this goal, and I am delighted that our indicators demonstrate our efforts to improve our site's environmental performance while ensuring optimal working conditions for our researchers. Additionally, we are integrating sustainability into our core business of providing scientific and technical advice for policy making, demonstrating that we are turning our commitment into action. Finally, I am pleased to report that we are making significant progress towards the construction of a new building for our JRC Seville site that will meet world-class environmental performance standards through innovative design, in line with the values and principles of the New European Bauhaus initiative.
-
Maria Pilar AGUAR FERNANDEZ, SANTE Dir. F Grange, Ireland
We are located in the lush, green farmland of County Meath, Ireland where cattle farming is the main activity although sheep are not an uncommon sight in the fields around us.
We are particularly conscious of the agricultural setting of our site and take steps to ensure that our activities do not have a negative impact on our neighbours and the local environment. We include EMAS compliance as a feature of all contracts and look at how services to our staff can be delivered in an eco-friendly way.
During 2022 we delivered a number of projects. In particular:
- We continued the replacement of old watt high consumption lights with new LED low watt consumption lights on different places in our site.
- Once again big sections of our grassland (±3.75 ha) were left to grow into meadows, in order to allow plants and flowers to grow and provide nectar for insects such as bees, butterflies and hoverflies. A winter plan was put in place (one section of the building was closed and staff moved in the remaining sections and sharing offices with other colleagues) and more or less 12 tonnes of CO2 were saved.
Pia RENKILDE-HANSEN, Director-General DG Communication
The EU institutions’ outposts in the Member States – the Commission Representations and the European Parliament Liaison Offices – joined the EMAS process in 2021. They are the institutions’ public face at local level, with the overarching mission to engage with all segments of society. As such, the Representations and Liaison Offices are in the prime position to demonstrate first-hand, to the 450 million citizens of the Member States in which they are located, the European institutions’ firm commitment to the protection of the environment.
As of today, the Commission and the Parliament joined forces to implement EMAS in Valletta (Malta), Vienna (Austria), Budapest (Hungary) and Nicosia (Cyprus), whilst preparations are underway in Copenhagen (Denmark), Sofia (Bulgaria) and The Hague (Netherlands). This is done in the context of the so-called Houses of Europe, physical premises hosting the Commission Representations and the Parliament’s Liaison Offices in Member States.
The two-fold aim of the project is to reduce the environmental impact of the Houses of Europe and in doing so, also add credibility to the efforts of the European Union to lead change across Europe at large. The initiative is also the first known example of two European institutions implementing EMAS together, developing additional synergies and efficiencies, as well as a possible blueprint for others to follow.
Significant aspects, objectives, indicators and targets
Significant aspects and objectives
Each site reviews its environmental impact to identify the direct (and indirect) significant aspects and determine how they should be managed. The detailed approach is described in the EMAS handbook's Procedure No1, and the site level results are summarised below in Table Summary of significant environmental aspects which is revised yearly. There is no separate review for the Commission as a whole, although the significant aspects tend to correlate with the required reporting under Annex IV of the EMAS Regulation, and all these parameters are reported at corporate level.
Significance is determined taking into account frequency, severity, breach of law, magnitude, scope for control, applicable legislation, stakeholders' concerns, previous incidents, and the potential for taking action. Indicators and reporting have take into account the best environmental practices included in the sectoral reference document (SRD) for public administration, following a detailed site level analysis conducted in 2020. This considered all aspects of the SRD, particularly managing and minimising energy, water and waste consumption, minimising consumption of paper and consumables, and minimising the environmental impact of commuting, business travel, canteens and cafeterias, meetings and events organisation. It showed that the relevant aspects were generally well covered at Commission level. An evaluation is scheduled for 2024/5 to consider SRD aspects in the context of the new EMAS Guide (of November 2023).
The table below lists the significant aspects under the high level objectives in the Environmental Policy which include i) efficient resource use, ii) reducing emissions to air, iii) improving waste management, iv) protecting biodiversity, v) promoting green public procurement, and vi) legal compliance and emergency preparedness. Promoting internal and external communication in relation to these aspects, and staff participation, are also very important strategic objectives.
The Greening the Commission Communication (2019-2030) described how the Commission would seek climate neutrality by 2030, by first reducing its emissions as far as possible before compensating for the remainder through carbon removals. While reducing emissions is the most visible objective, the Communication also seeks to promote green public procurement and biodiversity. In effect the communication reinforces the main objectives of the Environmental Management System (as shown in the table below) but its main focus is quantitative targets for reducing emissions.
Summary of significant environmental aspects at site level
The table above indicates that resource consumption, particularly in relation to energy, CO2 emissions and other air emissions along with managing waste generation are particularly significant at most sites.
Nuclear emissions are a significant aspect of the JRC's former and current nuclear sites and are carefully controlled. Equally, waste discharges from experimental facilities at the JRC sites (whether solid or liquid) are important as they may potentially contain more hazardous chemicals than at sites serving a role of office administration, and are therefore subject to stricter control and monitoring. Although not generally a research site, Luxembourg does accommodate a laboratory used by nuclear inspectors, and which handles radioactive material. Medical waste however also requires special consideration, and medical services are present at many of the sites.
The Brussels site comprises mostly office buildings (and supporting infrastructure), and therefore the main concerns are energy consumption and related emissions, as well as waste production. The impact of staff mobility (professional travel and commuting) is also important.
In Luxembourg, the activities are mainly of administrative nature, with some support and logistics services (such as catering, office supplies, childcare facilities, etc.) so broadly similar aspects to Brussels. But Luxembourg also hosts the main data centres of the Commission and a radiation protection laboratory.
- JRC Geel is registered as a "class 1 facility" for the Flemish Environmental License, meaning that it has significant environmental impact resulting from its activities in the nuclear and chemical/biological fields. As such, almost all the aspects mentioned under the EMAS objectives (Table Summary of significant environmental aspects) apply.
- At JRC Ispra, the environmental aspects and impacts are calculated on the basis of a site-procedure, which takes into consideration Probability (P) and Gravity (G) criteria to define whether an environmental aspect is significant or not.
- JRC Karlsruhe undertook the first full update of the environmental aspects in 2007. These are described in the Environmental Aspects Register (IMS-KRU-S6.6-RGS-0001). It is usually reviewed annually and updated, when necessary and most recently in May 2023. Significant impacts associated with four main aspect groups were identified, mainly concerning the use of resources, emissions and the generation of radioactive waste. Due to the mostly static character of site activities, these have remained unchanged for several years.
- In JRC Petten monitors the Environmental Aspects on site level by annually carrying out the Update of the Environmental Aspect Register on unit level. The 2023 results show that all six EMAS aspects are significant.
- In JRC Seville, the identified significant environmental aspects are related to offices used in rented premises. Business travels are considered under the corporate umbrella.
For DG SANTE at Grange, a study of the Grange environmental aspects was undertaken for the first time in 2014. Examination and evaluation of Grange's environmental aspects and impacts, both direct and indirect under normal, abnormal and emergency conditions was developed in 2017. The identification of environmental impacts takes account of the organisation’s current and past activities, products and/or services. This table is reviewed and updated every year. The last addition, as a direct consequence of Covid-19, has been the indicator regarding public health.
In DG COMM’s Representations, the activities are mainly of administrative nature, with some support and logistics services. The identified significant aspects reflect the Houses of Europe as a whole, including the EPLO.
Assessing the environmental impacts of EU policies
The Commission takes environmental issues into account when drafting and revising EU policies, through the impact assessment system usually managed through the Secretary General. This document does not consider this system and its application to the myriad of EU policies.
The Commission provides financial support for environmental projects via the LIFE (and other) programmes and has policies addressing global warming and in relation to energy and transport. The following pages are among those dedicated to particular policies and important initiatives:
- Impact assessment system: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/impact-assessments_en
- EU environment policy and evaluation: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/index_en
- LIFE+ programme: https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/programmes/life_en
- Climate policy: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/index_en
- Energy strategy: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/index_en
- Transport policy: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/index_en
- The European Green Deal: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
The impacts assessment system therefore takes into account the environmental impact of EU policies and legislation on Member States. All draft impact assessment reports must be submitted for quality and scrutiny to the Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB). In principle, a positive opinion of the RSB is needed for an initiative accompanied by an impact assessment to proceed. RSB opinions are published alongside the final impact assessment report and proposal at the time of adoption. As the responsibility of the adoption of EU policies is shared with the European Council and European Parliament, the EMAS management system is not the appropriate tool for managing the detailed impact of these policies.
The Commission's management system therefore focuses on the Commission's operational activities, i.e. those that EC management can control or influence.
- Detailed information on EU policies available on https://european-union.europa.eu/index_en
- https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/regulatory-scrutiny-board_en
- Impact assessment reports
Indicators and targets
Corporate level indicators
In order to monitor the reduction of environmental impact at Commission level, several core indicators are defined for reporting at all the sites, and these generally correspond (or are closely related) to the parameters required under the EMAS Regulation. Sites may have their own indicators for specific purposes, e.g. use of buses to get to the site in the JRC in Ispra and Petten, or in the case of the nuclear site of JRC Karlsruhe, the measurement of alpha and beta aerosols in the exhaust air. The site targets for each parameter are added together and weighted to provide an overall Commission target. Sites review their targets annually and any changes result in a corresponding change in the overall Commission target.
Targets for the core indicators are established for the medium to long term. When Commission level reporting was introduced in 2014 the target horizon was 2014-2020. (Currently 2015 is sometimes referred to as a base year because the data was more complete in the second Commission level reporting exercise, and because some DGs use this as a base year for model predictions).
Targets for 2030 and the Greening Communication
By 2020, the next target year for measuring the Commission's performance improvement was selected as 2030 (coherent with the Sustainable Development Goals) with 2023 as an interim year to measure progress under the current Commission. The adoption of the Greening Communication established 2019 as the baseline year for 2030 with this also adopted as a baseline in EMAS reporting particularly for emissions.
Overall targets include:
- 50% reduction in staff missions’ and experts' missions (by 2024)
- 30% reduction in emissions from buildings operations and fixed assets
- 36% reduction in staff commuting and vehicle fleet emissions
- 29% reduction in IT fixed assets emissions
- 6% reduction in emissions from goods, waste and services
Other considerations
- Transition to 100% green electricity
- 100% electric vehicle fleet by 2027
Past performance
The table and figure below shows how selected core parameters have reduced since 2015, and demonstrates continued improved performance at Commission level. The COVID situation led to significant reductions in office paper use and non-hazardous waste generation as staff worked from home. Energy, water consumption also reduced although emissions rose slightly owing to the additional heating needs (as recirculation was not possible) in the office buildings.
Some of the parameters experienced a rebound in 2023 generally due to a higher office presence following the COVID pandemic and as explained in the following chapters.
| Performance (%) | Targets (%)* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | No | Corporate indicator | Units* | 2015-23 | 2019-23 | 2019-30** |
| Comm | 1a | Total energy consumption (buildings) | MWh/p | -48 | -38 | -37** |
| kW/m2 | -33 | -29 | -25** | |||
| Comm | 1c | Non-renewable energy (buildings) | MWh/p | -58 | -46 | -38** |
| Comm | 1d | Water use | m3/p | -45 | -39 | -25** |
| All | L/m2 | -34 | -29 | -19** | ||
| Comm | 1e | Office paper consumption | Sht/p/d; T/p | -83 | -73 | -62** |
| Comm | 2a | CO2 emissions (buildings)*** | Tonnes CO2e/p | -57 | -43 | -44 |
| All | kgCO2/m2 | -48 | -34 | -35 | ||
| Comm | 2c | CO2 emissions (vehicles, manufacturer specification) | gCO2/km | -56 | -42 | -57 |
| Comm | Total carbon footprint **** | Tonnes CO2e | -30 | -38 | ||
| Comm | 3a | Non-hazardous waste | Tonnes/p | -51 | -50 | -24** |
| Comm | 3c | Residual waste | Tonnes/p | -69 | -62 | -26** |
Notes:* targets from 2024 Global Annual Action Plan;
** target achieved in 2023; for individual site targets see:
1a - Table Buildings' final energy consumption, 1c - Table Total renewable and non renewable energy consumption, 1d - Table Total water use, 1e - Table Office paper consumption,
2a - Table Emissions from buildings' energy consumption at Commission EMAS sites, 2c - Table Average tailpipe emissions of vehicle fleet according to manufacturer,
3a - Table Total non-hazardous waste, 3c - Table Residual waste as proportion of total waste at EMAS sites
(data based on internal targets action plan 2024)
***from operational energy use and coolant losses
**** for scope as defined in 2019


