 |
Jekk jogħġbok innota li din il-websajt se tkun qed tgħaddi minn xi aġġornamenti din il-ġimgħa. Konsegwentement, l-utenti jistgħu jesperjenzaw instabilità u funzjonalità limitata. Niskużaw ruħna għall-inkonvenjenza.. ("Google tradotta" mill Ingliż oriġinali) |
For a better user experience please update your browser or use Chrome or Firefox browser.
Utilitajiet
Publication detail
Home
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2000 in Case C-384/98 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht St Pölten): D. v W. (Sixth VAT Directive — Exemption for medical care provided in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — Supply by a doctor approved as a court expert of an opinion in a paternity dispute)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2000 in Case C-384/98 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht St Pölten): D. v W. (Sixth VAT Directive — Exemption for medical care provided in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — Supply by a doctor approved as a court expert of an opinion in a paternity dispute)
Metadejta tal-pubblikazzjoni
- Ippubblikat:
- Awtur(i) korporattiv(i): Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea)
- CELEX : C2000/335/09
- OJ : JOC_2000_335_R_0005_01
Viżwalizzatur tad-dokument
Note:
Il-pubblikazzjoni ma tistax tintwera fil-viżwalizzatur tad-dokument. Verżjoni miftuħa fuq l-internet
Tista’ taċċessaha minn: Iddawnlowdjar u lingwi