-
Publicado08/01/2025
-
Fecha límite07/02/2025
-
Apertura de las ofertas07/02/2025
-
Concedido(s)07/04/2025
-
Hoy17/10/2025
Utilidades
- Indica los códigos CPV deducidos del texto del procedimiento
Public Service Apprenticeship Advisor
A Public Service Apprenticeship Advisor to further progress the commitment set out in the ‘Action Plan for Apprenticeship 2021-2025’ to grow the number of apprenticeship registrations across the public service, including local authorities, to reach 750 annual registrations by 2025. The successful tenderer will be expected to be the central point of contact offering co-ordination and advisory services to public service bodies and connect them to the servcies needed to establish an apprenticeship in their organisation. Tenderers are required to provide reports and develop key metrics which will act as indicators of progress to relevant stakeholders including this Department, public sector organisations, the civil service, and education providers.
https://www.etenders.gov.ie/epps/cft/viewTenders.do?resourceId=4913306
https://www.etenders.gov.ie/epps/cft/viewTenders.do?resourceId=4913306
73000000 - Servicios de investigación y desarrollo y servicios de consultoría conexos
73200000 - Servicios de consultoría en investigación y desarrollo
73210000 - Servicios de consultoría en investigación
71241000 - Estudio de viabilidad, servicios de asesoramiento, análisis
72224000 - Servicios de consultoría en gestión de proyectos
79411100 - Servicios de consultoría en desarrollo comercial
79410000 - Servicios de consultoría comercial y en gestión
71621000 - Servicios de ensayo o consultoría técnicos
73220000 - Servicios de consultoría en desarrollo
80000000 - Servicios de enseñanza y formación Código CVP deducido del texto del procedimiento Generado por IA
Tipo: price
Descripción: No. AWARD CRITERIA Marks Available MQT Page Limit 1. Quality of Approach and Methodology to Service Delivery 125 Marks 75 2 2. Contract Management 125 Marks 75 2 3. The Public Service Apprenticeship Advisor 300 Marks 180 2 4. Sustainable Contract Delivery 50 Marks - 2 5. Price 400 Marks N/A N/A TOTAL 1000 Weightings Meanings 91% to 100% Excellent response providing comprehensive and convincing assurance that the Tenderer will deliver to an excellent standard. 80% to 90% A very good response which demonstrates real understanding and assurance that the Tenderer will deliver to a good or high standard. 60% to 79% A satisfactory response which demonstrates a reasonable understanding of requirements and gives reasonable assurance of delivery to an adequate standard, but does not provide sufficiently convincing assurance to award a higher mark. 30% to 59% A response where reservations exist. Lacks full credibility/convincing detail, and there is a risk that delivery will not be successful. 1% to 29% A response where serious reservations exist. This may be because, for example, insufficient detail is provided, or the response has fundamental flaws, or is seriously inadequate or seriously lacks credibility with a high risk delivery will be unsuccessful. 0% No Response or response completely fails to address the criterion under consideration. Tenderers must score the Minimum Qualifying Threshold “MQT”, allocated to all non-cost criteria (Criteria 1, 2 and 3) in the CFT in order to come under consideration for awarding of the contract. Failure to achieve the MQT in any of these non-cost criteria will result in the Tenderer being eliminated from the competition and not being scored for Criterion 4 - Price. Where a specified page limit has been exceeded the Client may elect, at its sole discretion, not to give any consideration to that element of the tender exceeding the specified page limit. Price: The lowest priced Tender shall be awarded the maximum points available under this criterion and the points of all other Tenders under this criterion shall be calculated using the following formula. Cost Score = Lowest Tendered Rate x Maximum Number of Marks Available Tendered Rate under evaluation Tie Break: Where the evaluation results in a tie between two or more tenders, then the following process will be followed to determine the ranking and the successful tender: The tender with the highest overall ‘Qualitative’ score (total of marks awarded under Criteria 1-4) shall be deemed the Most Economically Advantageous Tender.
Ponderación (porcentaje, exacto) :
Dirección postal:
Población/ciudad: Celbridge
Código postal: W23 HK00
País:
El contenido de esta página constituye exclusivamente un servicio adicional, y no tiene efectos jurídicos. Las instituciones de la UE no asumen responsabilidad alguna por su contenido. Las versiones oficiales de los anuncios de licitación pertinentes son aquellas publicadas en el suplemento del Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea y disponibles en TED. Se puede acceder a esos textos oficiales directamente mediante los enlaces integrados en esta página. Para más información, véase la declaración relativa a la explicabilidad y la responsabilidad en materia de contratación pública.