1. The subject of the contract is the supply of equipment for the Commune of Węgska Górka and the Commune of Lipowa for the purposes of the project entitled: "Climate protection with new technologies". 2. The contract was divided into the following four lots: 1) Lot No 1 – ‘Supply of unmanned aerial vehicles including the provision of STS pilot courses’; 2) Lot No 2 – ‘Supply of computer equipment and GPS navigation devices’; 3) Lot No 3 – ‘Satellite telephone supply’; 4) Part of contract No 4 – ‘Supply of equipment to counteract threats and eliminate their consequences’. 3. Under Lot 1 the Contractor will be required to provide: 1) for the Municipality of Hungary Górka: a) 5 unmanned aerial vehicles, b) 4 SAR software licenses, c) 1 unmanned aerial vehicle with docking base, d) conduct pilot course STS-02 to operate unmanned aerial vehicles for 16 people; 2) for the Municipality of Lipowa: a) 2 unmanned aerial vehicles, b) 2 SAR software licenses, c) 1 unmanned aerial vehicle with docking base, d) conduct pilot course STS-02 to operate unmanned aerial vehicles for 4 persons; – under the project entitled: "Climate protection with new technologies". 4. Under Lot 2 the Contractor will be required to provide: 1) for the Municipality of Hungary Górka: a) 4 sets of laptop computer equipment, b) 16 GPS navigation devices; 2) for the Municipality of Lipowa: a) 2 sets of laptop hardware, b) 4 GPS navigation devices; – under the project entitled: "Climate protection with new technologies". 5. Under lot 3, the Contractor will be required to provide 4 satellite telephones with 8 subscriptions for the Municipality of Węgska Górka, as part of the project entitled: "Climate protection with new technologies". 6. Under Lot 4, the Contractor will be required to provide: 1) for the Municipality of Hungary Górka: a) 5 AVR aggregates 3kW, b) 4 tents 3x4.5 m scissor, c) 24 sets of helmet communication, d) 4 megaphones; 2) for the Municipality of Lipowa: a) 1 AVR unit 3kW, b) 1 AVR unit 260kW, c) 3 AVR units 8,5kW, d) 1 trailer for 260kW unit, e) 5 motopump WT30X, f) 1 floating motopump, g) 1 3x4.5 m scissor tent, h) 1 ladder 10 m, i) 6 helmet communication sets, j) 5 LEL meters, k) 5 megaphones; – under the project entitled: "Climate protection with new technologies". 7. The scope of the subject-matter of all lots is specified in Annex 7 to the FTZ – Description of the subject-matter of the contract and the requirements for the performance of the contract in Annex 8 to the FTZ – Draft contract. 6 Equivalence clause: a) The Ordering Party, in accordance with the provisions of Art. 5 and Art. 101 para. 4 of the PPL Act, allows equivalent solutions for supplies, works, materials, systems that meet the requirements specified in the procurement documents. The contracting authority stipulates that, wherever trade marks, patents or the origin of equipment or materials are indicated in the description of the subject-matter of the contract in Annex 7 to the FTZ – Description of the subject-matter of the contract, they must be regarded only as proposals. The Ordering Party allows methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies, etc. equivalent to those presented in the description of the subject of the contract. It is therefore permissible to propose in the offer any equivalent market equivalents with properties not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party. The parameters indicated in the procurement documents shall specify the minimum technical, operational, performance, quality and functional conditions to be met by the subject-matter of the contract. The offer may include methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies, but with technical, quality, performance and functional parameters. At the request of the Contracting Authority, the Contractor is obliged to prove that the solutions applied will achieve all the technical assumptions for the investment task in question, taking into account the entire investment, and not the selected part of the whole. The burden of proving that the material or equipment is equivalent to the requirement specified by the Contracting Authority shall lie with the Contractor. If the materials and/or equipment offered by the Contractor as equivalent are not equivalent in the light of the documents submitted by the Contractor, the Contractor's tender will be rejected as not corresponding to the content of the FTZ. The contracting authority shall also indicate, pursuant to Article 101 para. 4 of the Public Procurement Act, that wherever describing the subject of the contract there is a reference to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems. The Ordering Party shall allow solutions equivalent to those described. In such a case, the procedure described in the previous text of this paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis; in the case of equivalent technologies, systems, materials or equipment accepted by the Contractor, the tender must be accompanied by a list of such technologies, systems, devices or materials, which shall include in its content: the type and description of the technology or system used, the name of the device/material used, the name of the manufacturer, the precise and unambiguous type of device or material; c) in addition, for technologies/systems/devices/equivalent materials, the Contracting Authority requires proof of equivalence, including by means of technologies/systems/devices/equivalent materials attached to the list; calculations, detailed technical drawings, approvals, declarations of conformity to regulations and standards and data sheets of manufacturers of equivalent equipment/materials. These documents must state unequivocally the equivalence of the proposed technologies/systems/equipment/materials; Further recordings in SWZ.
Text automatically translated in your browsing language
