1) The subject of the contract is the supply of electricity for: the City of Piotrków Trybunalski and its organisational units, Piotrkowskie Wodociągów i Kanyzacji Sp. z o.o., Miejski Zakład Komunikacyjny Sp. z o.o. Piotrkowskiego District and its organisational units, Municipalities of the District: Aleksandrów, Czarnocin, Gorzkowice, Grabica, Łęki Szlacheckie, Moszczenica, Ręczno, Rozprza, Sulejów, Wola Krzysztoporska, Wolbórz and all organisational units forming part of the aforementioned municipalities on the basis of a joint tendering agreement. Total up to 1982 energy consumption points at equal price conditions per 1 MWh for all tariffs. 2) Common Procurement Vocabulary The main subject of the contract: 09310000-5 – Electricity 3) The contracting authority does not reserve the obligation for the contractor to perform key tasks in person. 4) The Ordering Party does not specify the requirements for the employment of persons by the Contractor or subcontractor on the basis of the employment relationship referred to in Article 95 of the Public Procurement Act. 5) The Contracting Authority does not reserve the possibility of applying for a contract only by the Contractors referred to in Article 94 of the Public Procurement Act. 6) The Contracting Authority does not require the contractor to employ persons referred to in Art. 2 point 2 of the PPL Act. 7) A detailed description of the subject of the contract, a description of the contracting authority's requirements for implementation and acceptance are determined by: a) description of the subject-matter of the contract – FPZ PART II OPZ, b) draft provisions of the contract – FPZ PART III PPU. The requirements set out in the procurement documents shall be binding on the Contractor. 2. Subdivision of the contract into lots 1) The contracting authority shall not subdivide the contract into lots. Thus, the contracting authority does not allow the submission of partial tenders referred to in Article 7(15) of the Public Procurement Act. (2) Reasons for non-division: The subject-matter of the contract is homogeneous and covers the purchase of electricity for the participants in the joint procedure, for a total of up to 1982 energy consumption points (EPPs), on equal price terms per MWh for all tariffs. The contracting authority considered the possibility of dividing the contract, in particular according to individual entities, locations, tariffs or EPP groups, but considered such a division to be pointless. The purpose of the joint procedure is to aggregate the demand of the participants and to use the scale of the contract in order to obtain the most favourable and uniform conditions for the purchase of energy. The splitting would lead to a dispersion of volumes, could reduce the economic benefits of joint purchasing, and could result in different commercial conditions and increased contract handling costs. The absence of splitting does not restrict competition, as there are several electricity sellers on the market with the potential to execute a contract covering the entire projected volume and all 1982 PPE. The scope of the contract does not require the implementation of various types or specialized services. Bearing in mind the homogeneous nature of the subject-matter of the contract, the purpose of the joint purchase, the benefits of volume aggregation and the preservation of real competition, the Contracting Authority considered that not dividing the contract into lots was a reasonable, proportionate and economically justified solution. 3. Variant offers The Employer does not allow the submission of variant offers. 4. The Ordering Party does not provide for the right of option. 5. Similar/additional contracts The Contracting Authority does not provide for the award of the contract referred to in Art. 1 point 8 of the PPL Act
Text automatically translated in your browsing language
