Tender reference number
32/2600025686FAIR
Description
The DN400CF hydroformed bellows assemblies of the Super-FRS beamline are designed to operate at room temperature under an ultimate pressure below 10?7 mbar. These hydroformed bellows assemblies function as flexible and adaptable connections between adjacent vacuum components, ensuring vacuum integrity while accommodating mechanical tolerances and thermal expansion.
Submission Method
Electronic via:
https://www.dtvp.de/Satellite/notice/CXS0YYEYT5HYSATT
Tenders may be submitted
Electronic submission: required
https://www.dtvp.de/Satellite/notice/CXS0YYEYT5HYSATT
Information about a public contract, a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system (DPS)
Not available
Conditions for opening tenders (date)
05/05/2025 12:00
Award method
Criterion: Price
Type: price
Description: Consideration of the price through the valuation method "tenderfile_valuation_ufabII_label"
Weight (percentage, exact): 45.00000000
Criterion: Compliance with the time and delivery schedule
Type: quality
Description: Clear commitment to meeting the agreed delivery schedule with realistic planning. Well-defined project timeline, milestones, and checkpoints to track progress. Assessment of readiness regarding production capacity, material availability, and supply chain stability. Logistical considerations, including shipping, packaging, and handling for safe and timely delivery. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Weight (percentage, exact): 13.75000000
Criterion: Design Process
Type: quality
Description: Logical and comprehensible presentation of the design concept. Detailed description of production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Detailed procedure ensuring compliance with crucial manufacturing tolerances. Clear explanation of how specifications are met, including manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Demonstration of a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain. Proposals for technical improvements and detailed explanations of changes. Dedicated personnel assigned to the project for seamless execution and timely delivery. The proposal must clearly state the planned materials used for production, ensuring they meet required specifications. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Weight (percentage, exact): 13.75000000
Criterion: Quality Assurance and Documentation
Type: quality
Description: Precise explanation of the QA approach and its involvement in all manufacturing and acceptance tests. Evaluation of how QA is integrated into visual, mechanical, and vacuum and relative magentic permiability tests to ensure design goals. Assessment of how well the described test methods detect errors early, limit, and eliminate them efficiently. Standard-compliant QA documentation, adherence to FAIR standards, and structured reporting on technical characteristics. Relevant certifications for critical production steps (e.g., welding) and compliance with industry standards. Evaluation of professional risk assessment regarding hazards, declaration of incorporation, and mitigation strategies. Logical and transparent offer description; unclear scope is considered a project risk. Assessment of potential project risks that could cause delays or non-fulfillment of goals. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Weight (percentage, exact): 13.75000000
Criterion: Production
Type: quality
Description: Detailed description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Clear demonstration of how specifications are met, covering manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Comprehensive planning of resources, coordination efforts, and availability of materials/components. Statements concerning subcontractors and the quality of materials and components used in production. Evaluation of the production chain, focusing on the quality and technological advancement of machines and tools used. Assessment of welding methods for accuracy, safety, and prevention of deformation. Evaluation of surface treatment and cleaning processes, with preference for those ensuring vacuum compatibility. Clear methodology for achieving and guaranteeing specified manufacturing tolerances. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Weight (percentage, exact): 13.75000000
Estimated value
Not available
Final contracted value
168,570.56 EUR
Award of contract
Official name:
T.E.E.S. srlPostal address:
Town: Rome
Postal code: 00164
Country:
