Purchase together with delivery of IP telephony devices for the needs of the Police units of the Mazowieckie garrison’ – in accordance with the Description of the subject-matter of the contract (OPZ) – Part I (framework contract). Text automatically translated in your browsing language Automatically translated

1. The Contractor is bound by the tender until 09.02.2026. The first day of the deadline for binding the tender is the day on which the deadline for submitting tenders expires. Time limit for performance of the contract – framework contract: the term of the framework contract shall be set at 18 months from the date of conclusion of the contract or until the amount earmarked for the performance of the contract has been exhausted earlier, whichever is the earlier. Deadline for implementing orders: the contractor is obliged to complete the subject of the contract within a maximum period of 90 calendar days from the day following the date of conclusion of the implementing contract. 2. A detailed description of the subject of the contract is included in:  Annex No 1 to the FTZ – Description of the subject-matter of the contract (OPZ) – Comparative table of the equipment offered,  Annex No 2.1 to the FTZ – draft framework contract  Annex No 2.2 to the FTZ – draft implementing contract  Annex No 3.1 to the FTZ – offer form to the framework contract  Annex No 3.2 to the FTZ – offer form to the implementing contract 3. The expected quantities of equipment set out in the OIP - Annex 1 to the FTZ are estimated quantities that the contracting authority plans to purchase during the term of the framework contract. The quantities indicated do not constitute an obligation on the part of the contracting authority to purchase the same quantity. 4. For the equipment indicated in the ROP – Annex 1 to the ROP, the parameters given are minimum values. All devices should comply with all provisions regarding the right to use in Poland and have appropriate documents confirming compliance with all the necessary standards and guidelines that should be met by the above-mentioned equipment before it is put into use. 5. The contractor will deliver the goods brand new and free from physical and legal defects. Physical defect should also be understood as any incompatibility with the Description of the Subject of the Order (OPZ). 6. The Contractor shall ensure that the packaging of the goods is such as to prevent their damage or deterioration during transport to the warehouse. 7. The type and quality of packaging required shall be determined by the relevant technical standards or, in the absence of such standards, by any circumstances known to the economic operator concerning the conditions of transport of the goods to the warehouse and the conditions to be expected in the warehouse. 8. The Contractor undertakes to deliver the subject of the contract by his own transport at his own expense, in a one-time delivery. Along with the delivery, the contractor will provide a document clearly indicating the Manufacturer, the model / symbol along with the serial numbers of the devices, clearly specifying the period of the warranty granted. 9. The Contractor undertakes to ensure unloading and deliver the goods in accordance with the ordering party's instructions to the warehouse of the Communications and IT Department of the Provincial Police Headquarters in Radom located at ul. 11 November 37/59. 10. Equivalence criteria: 1. Whenever the subject-matter of the contract has been described by reference to standards, European technical assessments, approvals, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 1 point 2 and paragraph. 3 of the PPL Act. The contracting authority indicates that solutions equivalent to those described are acceptable and that such reference is accompanied by the words ‘or equivalent’. On the other hand, in the case of a reference and the simultaneous absence of the indicated words ‘or equivalent’, the Contracting Authority requires that each time such references be treated as if they were accompanied by the words ‘or equivalent’. 2. The contracting authority defined equivalence criteria, i.e. selected characteristics of the subject-matter of the contract. In the CIP, these equivalence criteria are crucial for the Contracting Authority. By allowing equivalence, the contracting authority specified the scope of the minimum parameters on the basis of which it will assess compliance with the requirements set out in the FTZ. 3. Equivalence should be adopted taking into account relevant parameters not worse than those resulting from standards, European technical assessments, catalog sheets or other documents of the type Technical documentation of the Manufacturer containing the specification of the offered product confirming the requirements of the Ordering Party with the help of which the description of the subject of the contract was made, in particular taking into account the data indicated in the OPZ. 4. The assessment of the equivalence of the solution offered should be guided by the purpose and function resulting from the documentation, demand and use. 11. Warranty period: The minimum required guarantee period is 36 months. The Contractor shall provide a guarantee for the offered items of the contract for a period consistent with the period indicated in the Offer Form counting from the date of signing without reservations of the acceptance protocol of the subject of the contract. 12. Advances: The Ordering Party pursuant to Art. 1 of the Public Procurement Act allows for an advance payment of up to 95% of the gross value of the performance contract on the basis of an application received from the Contractor and accepted by the Contracting Authority in accordance with the detailed rules set out in § 4 of the performance contract. 3) Reason for not dividing the contract into lots: The contracting authority decided not to divide the contract into lots. According to the contracting authority, this Decision does not affect fair competition by restricting the possibility for smaller entities, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises, to apply for the contract. The implementation of the entire contract by one contractor results in lower unit prices of the subject of the contract, while increasing the competitiveness of the procedure (greater profitability for companies when the whole is an unselected element of a larger contract). Moreover, the lack of division into lots does not limit access to the contract for smaller and medium-sized enterprises. Text automatically translated in your browsing language Automatically translated

32429000 - Telephone network equipment