-
Published14/01/2025
-
Deadline17/02/2025
-
Today18/03/2025
Utilities
- indicates text translated automatically in your browsing language
Buildings with specialist planning in the course of the redesign of the Ried railway station environment Negotiated procedure with upstream participation competition pursuant to § 17 VgV Text automatically translated in your browsing language Automatically translated
The description of the requirements for participation and the criteria for the selection of participants in accordance with Section 6 §§ 73 et seq. VgV, which is identical to the announcement, can be found in the attached procedural description. The planning task must be carried out by a working group consisting of architect, structural planner and electrical planner. The technical plans are commissioned with separate contracts. It is the architect's responsibility. If all planning services can be offered from a single source, an individual application and commissioning as a general planner is possible. Each member of an applicant group must fill in his/her own application form to prove his/her suitability (completed, if necessary, with required contract-specific declarations). The application forms and the required order-specific declarations must be submitted: self-declarations regarding the absence of grounds for exclusion pursuant to §§ 123 and / or 124 GWB; Self-declarations on the absence of an infringement pursuant to Section 21(1) of the Posting of Workers Act (AentG) and Section 98c(1) of the Residence Act (AufenthG) and Section 19(1) of the Minimum Wage Act (MiLoG). Selection criteria Architect: proof of professional qualification as an architect; An indication of the averaged annual turnover for the last three financial years for which accounts have been closed (2022,2023,2024). The average annual turnover in the business area of the advertised service property planning building is assessed as described below: Above an average of EUR 500,000 net - 15 points, between an average of EUR 200,000 and EUR 500,000 net - 10 points, below an average of EUR 200,000 net - 5 points; proof of professional indemnity insurance; Indication of the average number of employees in the past 3 financial years: For the evaluation, the average of the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) is formed with from an average of 5 people - 10 points, from an average of 2 people to 4 people - 5 points, 1 person - 0 points; 2 References on the provision of comparable services from the reference period 01.01 2014 to the end of the application period. A reference shall be considered comparable if it cumulatively meets the following requirements: Provision of the service phases 2-8 in accordance with §34 HOAI, fee zone at least III; The references will be evaluated according to the following project-specific criteria: Difficulty level of building planning according to § 35 HOAI: fee zone V - 15 points, fee zone IV - 10 points, fee zone III - 5 points; Task Planning of canopies: Freestanding canopy transport infrastructure - 15 points, Open pavilions in public space - 10 points, Open canopies in public space - 5 points; Eligible costs: over €500,000 net - 15 points, between €250,000 and €500,000 net - 10 points, up to €250,000 net - 5 points; Experience in participating in funding procedures in the context of project implementation: Proven - 5 points, not proven - 0 points; Selection criteria Structural engineer: proof of professional qualification as an engineer; proof of professional indemnity insurance; 1 Reference for the provision of comparable services from the reference period 01.01 2014 to the end of the application period. A reference shall be considered comparable if it cumulatively meets the following requirements: Provision of the service phases 2- 6 in accordance with § 51 HOAI, fee zone at least II; The references will be evaluated according to the following project-specific criteria: Difficulty level of structural design according to § 52 HOAI: fee zone IV - 15 points, fee zone III - 10 points, fee zone II - 5 points; Eligibility criteria Electrical planner: proof of professional qualification as an engineer; proof of professional indemnity insurance; If the organisation of the competition shows that more candidates are generally suitable than should be invited to submit a tender, the contracting authority will select the candidates who best meet the eligibility requirements. In order to determine these, the contracting authority will use a selection matrix with the above criteria. The three candidates with the highest score will be invited to submit a tender. If several candidates achieve the same number of points in third place, the tenderer who received the highest number of points in the evaluation of the references will be invited to submit a tender. If the candidates have the same score, the lot will be decided. Text automatically translated in your browsing language Automatically translated
https://plattform.aumass.de/Veroeffentlichung/av22fab8-eu
https://plattform.aumass.de/Veroeffentlichung/av22fab8-eu
Type: price
Description: Die Bewertung des Gesamt-Honorars erfolgt nach folgender Formel: Günstigstes Honorarangebot/Bieterhonorar x 60
Weight (percentage, exact):
Criterion:
Type: quality
Description: Qualifikation des Projektteams: Bewertung: Erfahrung in der Planung von Überdachungen von mindestens einem Projektteam-Mitglied (mind. LPH 1 - 4 § 34 HOAI 2021, mind. Honorarzone III): freistehende Überdachungen der Verkehrsinfrastruktur oder offene Pavillons im öffentlichen Raum oder offene Überdachungen im öffentlichen Raum - 10 Punkte. Der Nachweis einer Objektkategorie genügt zur Erreichung der vollen Punktzahl. Kann kein entsprechendes Objekt nachgewiesen werden, führt dies nicht zum Ausschluss. Entscheidend ist die Gesamtpunktzahl der Zuschlagskriterien 1 - 3
Weight (percentage, exact):
Criterion:
Type: quality
Description: Projektumsetzung / Herangehensweise an die Aufgabe (Darstellung an Referenzprojekten sowie in Bezug auf das zu planende Projekt): 1. Projektorganisation und Vorgehensweise bei der Leistungserbringung (Erreichbarkeit und Präsenz vor Ort in den verschied. Projektphasen), 2. Vorgehensweise und Instrumente zur Kosten-, Termin- und Qualitätssicherung während der Planung und Ausführung sowie Darstellung der konkreten Methodik; Bewertung: Sehr gut strukturierte und überzeugende sowie projektspezifisch herausragende und weit überdurchschnittliche Ausführungen, die eine besonders gute Leistung bzw. im Vergleich zu anderen Angeboten eine besonders gute Leistung erwarten lassen - 30 Punkte; Durchschnittliche Aussagen, die zwar projektspezifisch zufriedenstellend sind, aber dennoch Lücken und/oder Ungereimtheiten sowie in der Gesamtbetrachtung kleinere bis mittlere Mängel aufweisen und die eine (auch im Vergleich zu anderen Angeboten) mindestens durchschnittliche Leistungen erwarten lassen - 20 Punkte; Aussagen sind allgemein gehalten und ohne konkreten Projektbezug bzw. weisen deutliche Lücken und/oder Ungereimtheiten auf bzw. lassen mangels Informationsgehalt erhebliche Schwächen bei der Leistungserbringung erwarten oder sind deutlich schlechter als in anderen Angeboten - 10 Punkte;
Weight (percentage, exact):
This content published on this page is meant purely as an additional service and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The official versions of the relevant tendering notices are those published in the Supplement of Official Journal of the European Union and available in TED. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this page. For more information please see Public Procurement Explainability and Liability notice.