Case T-384/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Arbitration clause — ‘Construction all-risk’ insurance contract — Extension and renovation of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg — Damage caused by rainwater — Claim for reimbursement of costs and for payment of the indemnity — Scope of the insurance — Exclusion clause — Ancillary procedural obligations — Procedure by default in part)

DisplayCustomHeader

Maintenance EN

Please note that this website will be undergoing technical maintenance between 28 and 31 August. Consequently, users may experience instabilities and limited functionality. We apologise for the inconvenience.

Web Content Display (Global)

Publication Detail Actions Portlet

Utilities

Publication Detail Actions Portlet
 Rate this publication

custom-survey-notification

Publication Detail Portlet

Publication detail

Home

Case T-384/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Arbitration clause — ‘Construction all-risk’ insurance contract — Extension and renovation of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg — Damage caused by rainwater — Claim for reimbursement of costs and for payment of the indemnity — Scope of the insurance — Exclusion clause — Ancillary procedural obligations — Procedure by default in part)

Case T-384/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Arbitration clause — ‘Construction all-risk’ insurance contract — Extension and renovation of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg — Damage caused by rainwater — Claim for reimbursement of costs and for payment of the indemnity — Scope of the insurance — Exclusion clause — Ancillary procedural obligations — Procedure by default in part)

Publication metadata

Pop up window annotations

Publication Viewer

Document viewer

DisplayCustomFooter