ISSN - Footer
ISSN 2363-202X
Navigation
Skip to Content
Expanding data sources for the measurement of open science
DisplayLogo
Publications Office of the European Union
MainSearch
Select
All collections
EU law
EU publications
EU official directory
Editorial Content
Summaries of Legislation
More
Advanced search
Browse by subject
Expert Search
Language Selector
български (bg)
español (es)
čeština (cs)
dansk (da)
Deutsch (de)
eesti keel (et)
Ελληνικά (el)
English (en)
français (fr)
Gaeilge (ga)
hrvatski (hr)
italiano (it)
latviešu valoda (lv)
lietuvių kalba (lt)
magyar (hu)
Malti (mt)
Nederlands (nl)
polski (pl)
português (pt)
română (ro)
slovenčina (sk)
slovenščina (sl)
suomi (fi)
svenska (sv)
BasketSummary
0
X
Basket
x
items
X
This item has been added.
Qty:
x
€
x
Sub-total
€
x
Total
€
0.0
View basket
Checkout
MyPortal
Sign in
Navigation Menu
LAW
EU PUBLICATIONS
RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
OPEN DATA
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
EU WHOISWHO
Navigation Menu
LAW
EU PUBLICATIONS
RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
OPEN DATA
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
EU WHOISWHO
Publications Office of the EU
Help
Navigation Menu
Breadcrumb
Publication detail
Navigation Menu
AccessibilityTools
Maintenance EN
Please note that this website will be undergoing technical maintenance between 28 and 31 August. Consequently, users may experience instabilities and limited functionality. We apologise for the inconvenience.
Web Content Display (Global)
For a better user experience please update your browser or use
Chrome
or
Firefox
browser.
×
Publication Detail Actions Portlet
Utilities
Add to my publications
Create alert
Permanent link
Metadata RDF
(Opens New Window)
(Opens New Window)
Embed in website
More
Cancel
Rate this publication
custom-survey-notification
We would like to hear your views on this material or activity.
Please click here to provide your feedback.
Publication Detail Portlet
Publication detail
Home
EU publications
Download
Order
Expanding data sources for the measurement of open science
Publication metadata
Debates occurred on the data underlying the Open Science Monitor, as Elsevier Scopus database was used for the analysis of Open Access versus non-Open Access publishing behaviour for the countries selected in the study. In this quantitative case study, a comparison between the outcomes of the first analysis on OA publishing as performed for the OSM, with results of a study CWTS has performed for
another European project, Key Technology Domains (KTD) is analysed. The results show that while the two datasets differ in absolute numbers, patterns of the shares of OA publishing shown in the two studies is more or less the same. Both datasets can be used to monitor OA uptake and publishing. Further comparative analyses will be conducted to show the effect of having a more pluralist selection of data sources for monitoring OA publishing.
View more
View less
Download and languages
Close
Available languages and formats
Download
X
Available languages and formats
English
(en)
pdf
Publication details
Related publications
Published:
2019-09-26
Corporate author(s):
CWTS
,
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
(
European Commission
)
,
Elsevier.499
,
ESADE
Personal author(s):
Chan, Tung Tung
;
Leeuwen, Thed van
;
Meijer, Ingeborg
Themes:
Research policy and organisation
Subject:
case study
,
database
,
EU research policy
,
open access publishing
,
open science
PDF
ISSN
ISBN
978-92-76-00901-6
DOI
10.2777/339230
Catalogue number
KI-03-19-167-EN-N
PDF
ISBN
978-92-76-00901-6
DOI
10.2777/339230
Catalogue number
KI-03-19-167-EN-N
View more
View less
Publication Viewer
Document viewer
The document doesn't have a viewable format at this time
Go Back Widget
Back to list of results
