Search results
-
Case T-112/18: Action brought on 23 February 2018 — Pink Lady America v CPVO — WAAA (Cripps Pink)
- Corporate Author(s): General Court (Court of Justice of the European Union)
- Subject: pip fruit, plant variety right, principle of legal certainty
-
Case C-625/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2017 — Schniga GmbH v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO), Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, Elaris SNC (Appeal — Community plant variety rights — Application for a Community plant variety right — Apple variety ‘Gala Schnitzer’ — Technical examination — Test guidelines issued by the Administrative Council of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) — Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 — Article 23(1) — Powers of the President of the CPVO — Addition of a distinctive characteristic on completion of the technical examination — Stability of the characteristic during two growing cycles)
- Corporate Author(s): Court of Justice (Court of Justice of the European Union)
- Subject: equal treatment, pip fruit, plant breeding, plant variety right, principle of legal certainty
-
Case T-112/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Pink Lady America v CPVO — WAAA (Cripps Pink) (Plant varieties — Nullity proceedings — Cripps Pink apple variety – Articles 10 and 116 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Novelty — Derogative grace period — Definition of exploitation of the variety — Commercial evaluation — Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 — Late submission of evidence before the Board of Appeal — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
- Corporate Author(s): General Court (Court of Justice of the European Union)
- Subject: evidence, pip fruit, plant variety right
-
Case T-569/18: Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2019 — W. Kordes’ Söhne Rosenschulen v EUIPO (Kordes’ Rose Monique) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Kordes’ Rose Monique — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark consisting of a plant variety denomination — Essential elements — Article 7(1)(m) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(m) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
- Corporate Author(s): General Court (Court of Justice of the European Union)
- Subject: EU trade mark, floriculture, horticulture, plant propagation, plant variety right, registered trademark, trademark law
-
Case C-409/15 P: Appeal brought on 24 July 2015 by ABZ Aardbeien Uit Zaad Holding BV, Agriom BV, Agrisemen BV, Anthura BV, Barenbrug Holding BV, De Bolster BV, Evanthia BV, Gebr. Vletter & Den Haan VOF, Hilverda Kooij BV, Holland-Select BV, Könst Breeding BV, Koninklijke Van Zanten BV, Kweek- en Researchbedrijf Agirco BV, Kwekerij de Wester-Bouwing BV, Limgroup BV, Ontwikkelingsmaatschappij Het Idee BV against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 18 May 2015 in Case T-560/14: ABZ Aardbeien Uit Zaad Holding BV and others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
- Corporate Author(s): Court of Justice (Court of Justice of the European Union)
- Subject: biodiversity, derogation from EU law, genetics, human rights, international convention, legal basis, plant variety right, scientific research
-
Case T-177/16: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2019 — Mema v CPVO (Braeburn 78 (11078)) (New varieties of plants — Application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety Braeburn 78 (11078) — Designation of another examination office — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Obligation to state reasons)
- Corporate Author(s): General Court (Court of Justice of the European Union)
- Subject: pip fruit, plant breeding, plant variety right
